Case Library
See open, locked and completed rounds. Read the brief, inspect evidence and write your argument. A scheduled case unlocks only after its release time and the organizer releases it.
Find a case →
Question • Examine • Discuss • Lead
YOUR JURIS DASHBOARD
Choose a case, test your reasoning, or jump into a quick practice challenge. Your next strong argument starts here.
YOUR IDEAS. YOUR RESEARCH. YOUR VOICE.
You do not have to arrive with all the answers. Bring your curiosity, examine the evidence, and build an argument you can defend.
Participation is open to eligible students—not limited to ten. Case-specific award details and judging rules will appear with each confirmed challenge.
THE CASE CHALLENGE SERIES
Explore the proposed ten-case lineup. Each round is designed for six weeks of investigation and two weeks of final submissions.
$1,000 scholarship goal per challenge. Awards are confirmed only when funding and the case-specific rules are posted. Participation is open to eligible students; an award is not a payment for attendance.
YOUR FIRST CHALLENGE
Open a Case Lab. Identify one supported fact, one disputed claim, and one unanswered question.
Explore the Case Library →Explain your position, cite the evidence, and address the strongest argument against it. Save your work in the case activity.
Build your case →Respond respectfully to another perspective. In your reflection, explain what changed your thinking—or why it did not.
Write a reflection →These are learning prompts, not new scholarship requirements. Required submissions, scoring weights, and deadlines will be published in the award rules.
NEW • CHALLENGE ZONE
Try a fictional case, play Evidence Detective, and argue both sides. Earn personal practice badges as you learn.
Enter the Challenge ZonePractice badges are separate from scholarship judging.
SUPPORT JURIS
Support scholarships, educational materials, live programs, and case experiences.
OUR ANNUAL WASHINGTON, D.C. GOAL
Our goal is to take two student debate-challenge winners to Washington, D.C. each year for an educational experience focused on learning, leadership and public speaking.
This is a program we are working toward—not a confirmed trip or guaranteed prize. Funding, travel dates, the first travel year, eligibility, selection rules, supervision and covered expenses are still being developed.
Prepare by practicing evidence-based arguments, listening carefully and responding respectfully. Once a trip is funded, we will announce the debate challenge and its official rules before entries open. Regular quiz scores and case participation do not automatically qualify a student for travel.
JURIS ON YOUR PHONE
Add Project JURIS to your Home Screen now. The App Store version is the next phase.
Separate facts from claims, identify missing evidence, and test competing arguments.
→LIVEJoin a scheduled session or watch an approved replay in the same room.
→✎Keep your private legal-thinking journal and develop your reasoning over time.
→Q+ASee upcoming moderated prompts designed for respectful disagreement and analysis.
→IDView your JURIS interests, student ID, program access, and switch programs.
→WHAT'S NEXT
Choose a case from the library.
Join a live session.
Write what changed your thinking.
Develop a recommendation or argument.
LIVE CONNECTION
Loading…
JURIS and the mock election are separate activities, but you can use the same student account.
Open Mock Election HubLEGAL WORD DECODER
Tap a term to see what it means. These are introductory explanations; the applicable rules depend on the case and jurisdiction.
A statement that someone says is true but has not yet proved. An allegation is not automatically a fact.
Source: Cornell Legal Information InstituteInformation offered to help establish whether something is true, such as testimony, documents, or objects. Evidence may be disputed, and not everything offered can be used in court.
Source: Cornell Legal Information InstituteThe responsibility to establish a claim to the level of proof the law requires. Ask: who must prove what, and how convincing must the proof be?
Source: Cornell Legal Information InstituteGET COMFORTABLE IN THE HUB
My introduction video is coming soon. For now, follow this guide and checklist to learn your way around.
See open, locked and completed rounds. Read the brief, inspect evidence and write your argument. A scheduled case unlocks only after its release time and the organizer releases it.
Find a case →Try quick practice activities. These practice badges do not decide scholarship winners.
Practice →Search an unfamiliar word or browse A–Z. Definitions introduce concepts; the rules for a particular case may differ.
Decode a word →Open a published quiz, answer every question and submit once. Your result saves to your account. Unless a challenge’s rules say otherwise, quiz results are for learning.
View quizzes →Discuss ideas respectfully. Explain evidence, do not attack people. Reflection is where you record how your reasoning developed.
Join a discussion →Check the date in Central Time, prepare a question and use the Zoom button. Your microphone and camera controls are inside Zoom.
See Zoom sessions →Saving is not submitting. “Mark Case Complete” tracks your learning. Only “Submit Final Entry” records a challenge entry.
A scholarship goal is not a guaranteed award. Read each case’s confirmed funding and rules. Never assume a live lawsuit’s outcome guarantees a student payment.
YOUR FIRST FOUR STEPS
Use this personal checklist to find your way. Mark each step when you have done it. These checkmarks are self-reported reminders, not submission receipts or scholarship scores.
Checklist progress stays in this browser for your student ID; it does not sync across devices.
MY NEXT STEP
Get Started